nanog mailing list archives
Re: Current diameter of the Internet?
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 22:10:18 +0200
On 7/20/24 14:08, Matt Corallo wrote:
Geosync is probably the highest unloaded latency, but add in a little bufferbloat and you can easily get way more latency...I've definitely seen a minute+ pings on a plane, which is almost all queuing. I assume airplanes are not the only place with such horrendous queuing, even if most networks have done a good job at reducing that nonsense over the last decade.
I think if you eliminate packet loss and intermittency as a source of increased latency, geostationary satellite is probably as bad as it gets from a transport medium that is stable but just physically limited. 600ms is just about what you would see here.
I have seen subsea deliver as high as 450ms, but this purely a function of distance traveled, e.g., Cape Town to Auckland via Hong Kong, for example.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Josh Luthman (Jul 21)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Scott Q. (Jul 21)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Mel Beckman (Jul 22)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Sean Donelan (Jul 22)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Nathan Angelacos (Jul 22)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Josh Luthman (Jul 22)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Nathan Angelacos (Jul 22)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Mel Beckman (Jul 22)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Sean Donelan (Jul 23)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Mark Tinka (Jul 20)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Sean Donelan (Jul 22)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Shrikumar.H (Jul 22)
- Re: Current diameter of the Internet? Sean Donelan (Jul 23)
