nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 flag day
From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 23:34:28 +0200
Am 19.06.26 um 22:23 schrieb Aaron C. de Bruyn:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 1:03 PM Gary Sparkes <gary () kisaracorporation com> wrote:The clean path would be NPTv6 with ULA for the same exact setup. It would slot in and work identically to how the IPv4 deployment is today. Instead of RFC1918, you have ULA addressing. Same concept. Except with NPTv6 you're doing 1:1 and eliminate PAT. Of course, if you're single provider, might as well just use prefix delegation, NPT's real shine is the multi-WAN scenario with no upstream routing protocol that sparked off a lot of discussion. As to changing providers when using prefix delegation, most stuff can auto-update itself, but otherwise it's a simple find/replace exercise in documentation and records when your provider prefix changes as the last half of the address is entirely stable, and the first half is (mostly) provider.Maybe I need to do a bit more digging as I'm not an expert at IPv6--but aren't ULA addresses basically randomly assigned to hosts based on their NIC HW address and a few other things?
You should really, really improve your IPv6 knowledge.
A short example from a very large client I manage: They use IPv4 10/8 The next octet is allocated for the state the office is located in "plus 100". So if they open an office in Alabama (22nd state to join the union), it's gonna be 10.122/16. The third octet is assigned sequentially. The first office opened in Alabama is 10.122.0.0/24. The last octet is static. Router at .254, linux server at .250, Windows (ugh) RDP server at .249, workstations are DHCP between .100 and .199, etc...
That is almost impossible for large networks - as the address space if often too low. BTDT.
You can give me nearly any IP from this client and I know the device. But ULA gives me: fe80::ae1f:6bff:feb0:3c98/64
You seem to have no clue that ULA and link-local are different.fd00::/8 is ULA. You can use fd00:random::/48 and then set every bit in the last 80 bit.
Hard-code the address to fe80::122:00000:250/64 (just to know it's a linux server in Alabama) and then set up NPTv6...and update a *ton* of DNS info so the rest of the world can easily get to the correct machines?
No, you only use fe80 for link-local communication (mostly NDP, some discovery protocols), nothing else.
-- Gruß Marco Junk-Mail bitte an trashcan () stinkedores dorfdsl de _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/3VL3YYG5C2E7ATZVW2KW2YEVKDTTOLDD/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 flag day, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 flag day sronan--- via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day brent saner via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day David Prall via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Pedro Prado via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Marco Moock via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day William Herrin via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv4 flag day Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv4 flag day Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Jun 19)
