nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 flag day


From: Bill Woodcock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:49:54 +0200

Why not filter at internet-AS edges much sooner than that?
    
                -Bill


On Jun 16, 2026, at 08:35, Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

'ello,

I've babbled about this before, but apparently I'm babbling about it again.

Does anyone feel responsibility for the dual stack mess we've created?
It wasn't here when we found the Internet, and we're going to leave it
here after we leave, does not really jive with the whole leave
campground cleaner than found it ethos.

I don't see any future where organically IPv4 dies in such a way that
people offering services on the Internet are comfortable offering them
IPv6 only, the long tail will be too expensive to ignore.

Dual stack adds complexity, cost, reduces quality and security. It is
also blatantly an antitrust issue, as established players with access
to large allocations can outcompete new entrants with no IPv4
allocation.

In practice I'm thinking about something where relevant players all
sign an agreement to drop ipv4 at their edge in e..g 15 or 20 years.
Creating clear business justification for people to implement IPv6 in
their next upgrade cycle. Today if I'm an edge with the IPv4 addresses
I need, I wouldn't consider IPv6, because that's just a cost to me,
with no upside.
I know I could get some transit shops to sign off on such an
agreement, but no one cares about transit, this obviously doesn't work
without Amazon and Facebook et.al.

Sure edges still can have IPv4, but that's like edge having IPX or
AppleTalk, it'll be highly local issue, no one expects to reach
anywhere with it, and anticipates to translate 100% of external
traffic.

Amazon? Facebook? Google? Microsoft? Any appetite?

--
 ++ytti
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/E2XOPUM5UDSQYLXJKBAL57LDBASU72M4/


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/ZCZYRFFU47OQRLL426XZX63ZY3W4XJNO/

Current thread: