nanog mailing list archives

Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense...


From: "Vipul Shah" <svipul () novell com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 03:56:01 -0600



Another point that hasn't been mentioned in this thread is that this type
of attack is very easy to track down, since all the echo-reply packets
will have addresses in the same subnet.  A good portion of the problem
with smurf attacks is not so much the attack itself as the painful process
of tracking it to it's source.


By the time you trace the packets, identify the subnet, and convince the 
Network Administrator to detach the compromized system from the network,
 the victim's router might have crashed. Especially, when there are more 
than one DDoS agents are compromized over different networks, the 
victim site may loose several hours of business!

Vipul

Brandon Ross                                                 404-522-5400
VP Engineering, NetRail                            http://www.netrail.net 
AIM:  BrandonNR                                             ICQ:  2269442
Read RFC 2644!
Stop Smurf attacks!  Configure your router interfaces to block directed
broadcasts. See http://www.quadrunner.com/~chuegen/smurf.cgi for details.








Current thread: