nanog mailing list archives

Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense...

From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 07:28:21 -0400


At 06:10 PM 05/11/2000 -0500, Brett Frankenberger wrote:

I think the exposure that you seek to eliminate here is not an exposure
that is large enough to justify changing the behavior of host IP stacks.


I concur.

- paul

Current thread:

New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Vipul Shah (May 10)
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Paul Ferguson (May 11)
  - Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Daniel Senie (May 11)
    - Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Paul Ferguson (May 11)
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Brett Frankenberger (May 11)
  - Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Paul Ferguson (May 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Vipul Shah (May 11)
  - Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Brandon Ross (May 11)
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Vipul Shah (May 11)
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Vipul Shah (May 12)
  - Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Jerry Scharf (May 12)
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Brandon Ross (May 12)
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Steven M. Bellovin (May 12)
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Owen DeLong (May 12)
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Vipul Shah (May 16)
- Re: New Internet-draft on DDOS defense... Richard Steenbergen (May 19)