nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nat
From: Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon () cox net>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:28:17 -0600
On 12/16/2015 17:28, Mark Andrews wrote:
+1000000 Nobody should have to be doing NAT today. We need to make IPv4 painful to use. Adding delay between SYN and SYN/ACK would be one way to achieve this. Start at 100ms..200ms and increase it by 100ms each year.
If it is such a good idea, why do you have to do that? -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
Current thread:
- RE: Nat, (continued)
- Re: Nat Josh Reynolds (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Mark Andrews (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat alvin nanog (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Larry Sheldon (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Charles Monson (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Mark Andrews (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Mel Beckman (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Larry Sheldon (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Mark Andrews (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Stephen Satchell (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Lee Howard (Dec 18)
- Re: Nat Owen DeLong (Dec 18)
- Re: Nat Mark Andrews (Dec 18)