Re: Nat

[Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>]

While we will get us there eventually it will be at the considerably more expensive
for everyone involved.  There is also a distinct lack of a working free market in most
of the world.  There isn't one in Australia.  From what I read there isn't one in most
of the developed nations in the world including the US.

Mark

On 17/12/2015, at 11:14 AM, Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:

> Mark,
>
> Why? Why do WE "need" to force people to bend to our will? The market will get us all there eventually. 
>
> I don't like what you eat. Lets put a surcharge on it to make you feel pain and do what I want. :)
>
> -mel beckman
>
> > On Dec 16, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:
> >
> > This doesn't put pain on those that have enough addresses that they don't need
> > to NAT yet.  We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > > On 17/12/2015, at 10:39 AM, Charles Monson <charles.lists () camonson com> wrote:
> > >
> > > We need to make IPv4 painful to use.  Adding  delay between SYN and SYN/ACK would
> > > be one way to achieve this.  Start at 100ms..200ms and increase it by 100ms each year.
> > >
> > > It seems like NAT would be another way to make IPv4 more painful to use.